![2009 apple 8 core mac pro nehalem 2009 apple 8 core mac pro nehalem](https://img2.owcnow.com/buildabox/imgs/nav_imac_off.jpg)
The quad-core Mac Pro has four memory slots that ship with 3GB, 6GB, or 8GB of 1,066MHz DDR3 SDRAM modules the eight-core Mac Pro has eight DIMM slots for a maximum of 32GB of RAM. The memory modules are no longer installed on two sliding trays – instead, the memory and processor all rest on a sled at the bottom of the case, which you remove by releasing two latches. Upon opening the case, you immediately notice major changes in the layout of the components. Though the 2.26GHz model was faster at most individual tasks than the previous eightcore 2.8GHz Mac Pro, and very fast in a few of our professional applications tests, it was slower than the new quad-core model at the majority of our application tests.
#2009 apple 8 core mac pro nehalem software#
It’s harder to recommend that people spend £600 more for the new £2,499 2.26GHz eight-core Mac Pro if they don’t run software written for the top-of-the-line Mac Pro’s eight processor cores. That is especially true for people who work with processor intensive apps such as video or graphics. It would be a fine purchase for anyone replacing an older Mac or buying a new one for the first time. With its improved graphics, memory bandwidth, and reduced memory latency, the 2.66GHz quad-core Mac Pro was faster than the 2.8GHz eight-core Mac Pro, and at £1,899 costs £600 less. Apple’s most expandable Mac is the pro platform for power users.
![2009 apple 8 core mac pro nehalem 2009 apple 8 core mac pro nehalem](https://livedoor.blogimg.jp/applebrothers/imgs/1/d/1d0f1b9c.jpg)
![2009 apple 8 core mac pro nehalem 2009 apple 8 core mac pro nehalem](https://d28i4xct2kl5lp.cloudfront.net/product_images/1587052411.4617057.jpg)
And their new internal design makes adding hard drives, memory cards, and PCI Express 2.0 cards easier than ever. The new Mac Pros, with their cutting-edge Nehalem processor technology, are able to execute more tasks at a faster clip, despite lower processor speeds. Most routine apps perform better with fewer, faster processors.